Mark Darcy is dead. Yes, that’s right. Bridget’s love
interest, happily-ever-after, husband is gone. And Bridget is single again at
fifty one years old. That’s how the new book kicks off. Why oh why did author
Helen Fielding do this? Why, why, why? If she wanted to break them up, then
okay. Divorce them, or separate them, or reveal that Darcy is gay… Anything but
kill him off! Bridget and Darcy have two kids together, so she’s raising them
alone while trying to date again. Maybe Fielding wanted to explore being single
at an older age and for different reasons. But this is not the story to do
that. Write a completely new story with new characters and a widowed heroine at the
forefront. But don’t write this for Bridget. It’s just wrong.
And here’s why: Now the preceding two novels are ruined. Who
is going to read those knowing that Darcy dies? That puts a damper on those stories
because how can anyone be happy for Bridget reading those books knowing what
will happen? Plus, chick lit is an upbeat genre. People don’t want read it to
be depressed. And let’s face it… Darcy’s death is depressing. Poor Bridget. The
poor children. Poor Darcy! It’s just awful. No one opens chick lit wanting to
read any of that.
So, that brings up an interesting question… Is the new
Bridget Jones novel chick lit? Or has Fielding veered off into women’s fiction
of the more serious variety? Is it possible that Fielding has succumbed to the
awful trend in publishing now? You know the one where any kind of women’s fiction
has to be riddled with depressing subjects (divorce, death, cancer, etc.) for a
publisher to jump on board. Believe me, I get it. That stuff is real life. But
real life is also happy and full of love, and a lot of people do get the
fairytale, the happily ever after. And that is the heart of chick lit. If
readers want to be saddened, not entertained, then chick lit is not the genre
to read.
Or even worse, did Fielding do this for shock value and as a publicity stunt? It’s quite horrifying that not only Fielding, but her entire team think killing off Darcy is a good idea and a good direction for Bridget’s
story. But why, after all these years, ruin what Bridget’s fans love so much? It’s
mindboggling.
What do you think? Are you outraged? Will you still read Mad About the Boy or are you going to
ignore its existence and pretend Bridget and Darcy are still together? In remembrance
of Darcy, share your favorite scenes, what you love the most about him, and what you love about his relationship with Bridget.